The fact that the 4,000 miles of the Atlantic Ocean is that it only divides the small gaps between our cultural differences.

Where once the differences were a shrinking technology time difference with microwave ovens and colour television coming over to Britain 10-15 years later and the ever so slight increases in east coast societal differences between American and British societies, those differences have been reversing steadily. Now technology has almost converged but societal culture has been increasing exponentially in a number of ways.

When slavery was ended, Britain slowly altered [in line with its post imperial guilt] the British view of its desired relationship with black people and worked slowly but steadily towards equality for all minority groups with and under Britain’s wider attempts at dismantling the class structure. The disparities were seen as divisive and negative with no redeemable value [the differences caused by prejudice not the qualities of any good inherent philosophies.] Black children received as much of the same national education provided and Black people / families were not overly separated into isolated communities but rather merged mainly into working class areas with a presence in more affluent areas of council housing.

This integration plan has resulted [from that period of time and group] in what we can call British men and women with a middle class ranging from Idris Elba geezers to David Harewood and sisters populating the BBC and which has also become a Hollywood talent asset pool. There is still an under achieving level caused by a small market supply philosophy, an ongoing imbalance of opportunity and a low expectation view from a poor attitude culture held by both the original Caribbean group and worse from the more recent African groups. These differences also exist in Indian and more in Pakistani and other Muslim cultures.

A key difference is the relationships between women and men within the spectrum of cultures and of course British male behavior culture with British women and wider with women / men in general. It should not be a matter of argument that British men are considered [by fact of a general character] quite polite and gentlemanly [Product: Sidney Poitier / David Niven / Roger Moore et all] That was not an act or a role play but software as hardware. This culture has shrunk quite evidently.

In America the character of men is different and has always been different. Over politeness, deference self-effacing charm [all be it sometimes merely masking ego] respect and friendliness are regarded by American men historically as weakness of person by character. The days of role models such as Carrey Grant, James Stewart, Dean Martin et al are long gone and mostly forgotten. The American male character that has grown is the one largely promoted from the more insolent, go get, win win, in my time now, male attitude. The down side for women [especially by young men {under 35} is men not taking no for an answer [or as also promoted, a cultural male expectation of female interest] results in a similar frustration of go get, win win, now, with the commonly reported aggressive hostile belligerence directed against women.

In Britain to lesser evidence the same dissolution of male female courting has also occurred. There is also evidence that the minority culture of street jive / school / college is becoming the dominant cool norm for young male blueprinting behavior and for female expectation along with the [mostly pointless] pleasure of porn ‘banging booty’ sex. The tragedy of this culture is that behavior writes nature-genes which are then inherited which increases blueprinting / software into hardware.      

The recent events of an American male [not of the Cary Grant type role model] who rose to be a candidate of Americas highest court only to find his character being challenged by women alleging very serious flaws to question his suitability as a justice. Though cooborated including by other male peers the clear male dominant view was to dismiss all of the allegations as politically motivated female lies, despite the unspoken common cultural knowledge of American male attitude and behavior.

The outcome from this event [according to the rule of action and reaction] will be a building siege mentality between females and males. This will take place throughout the workplaces and the homes of America and finally reach into American high schools and colleges where regardless of lack of male acceptance of the culture [or culpability] female behavior will challenge and force the issue of male sexual social behavior into the light and force an alteration to male relations with women by the growing solidarity of female power. I hope.

The time the righting of this injustice will take will therefore have a long knock on effect on both sides of the Atlantic. Firstly men will be dismissive, condemning and vindictive. Next men will feel able to carry on assaulting women as they will get away with it because the women will not be believed because they were judged at the highest level as liars, against men. [Even if Kavanaugh is rejected at the last hurdle] This rising danger for women will cause a number pre-cautious changes to female contact with men. Young men will find it harder to conjugate with young women causing men [likely young reaction] to behave worse with women. It will be a long and tough road to be travelled by American women and to a lesser extent, women in Britain as well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOpRf3_z4FI